Claude 3 by Anthropic kya ‑100% Better Hai?
Claude 3 by Anthropic ne March 2024 me release kiya tha Claude 3 family:
– Haiku (fast/light)
– Sonnet (balanced)
– Opus (high‑end reasoning) Reddit+8Reddit+8TechRound+8Investopediadigipix.ai+12Wikipedia+12New York Post+12
In models ne logic, code, maths, aur document analysis me benchmark tests me GPT‑4 ko outperform kiya hai—MMLU: 86.8% vs GPT‑4’s 86.4%; Multilingual Maths me 90.7% vs 74.5% The Indian Express+1Moneycontrol+1.
Benchmark Performance & Intelligence
1. Standardized Tests (AI Race)
- MMLU (undergrad level): Cla ude 3 Opus – 86.8%; GPT‑4 – 86.4% The Indian Express+1Moneycontrol+1
- Multilingual Maths (0‑shot): Claude 3: 90.7%; GPT‑4: 74.5% arXiv+15The Indian Express+15Moneycontrol+15
- Other areas – coding, reasoning, factual accuracy—Claude broadly ahead Investopedia+15Moneycontrol+15Semrush+15
2. Real-World Use Cases
Tom’s Guide ke test me Claude ko choose kiya gaya over GPT‑4 thanks to:
- 200K context window
- App integrations (Notion, Canva etc.)
- Empathic style & fewer hallucinations Tom’s Guide+9Tom’s Guide+9Descript+9
Users bhi Reddit pe agree karte hain:
“Claude 3.5 Sonnet has impressed me with its coding prowess… more accurate… human‑like style.” Moneycontrol+15Reddit+15Descript+15
And:
“Can Confirm: Claude3 Opus is very notably better than GPT‑4… lack of a need to issue 2nd clarifying instructions” Wikipedia+8Reddit+8Anthem Création+8
Features: What Makes Claude 3 Special
Huge Context Window
200K tokens—ideal for long docs, research, legal texts. GPT‑4 max ~128K or 32K depending on version. digipix.ai+3Tom’s Guide+3Anthem Création+3
App Integrations
Latest update: direct Connectors to Notion, Canva, Stripe, Figma, Google Drive, Slack—powered by Model Context Protocol (MCP) Lifewire+2TechRadar+2Tom’s Guide+2
Safety & Ethics
Anthropic builds in conservative safeguards—model admits uncertainty and avoids both‑sides‑ism TIME
Reasoning & Code
- Better step‑by‑step reasoning (hybrid mode in 3.7) Reddit
- Clean, bug‑free code generation appreciated by devs Reddit+3Reddit+3Reddit+3
ChatGPT vs Claude 3: Head‑to‑Head
| Feature | Claude 3 (Sonnet/Opus) | ChatGPT (GPT‑4/4o) |
|---|---|---|
| Context Size | 200K tokens | 32–128K tokens |
| Reasoning & Benchmarks | Tops in MMLU, maths, logic | Strong but slightly behind |
| App Integrations | Connectors (Pro only) | Plugins + browsing |
| Coding | Minimal bugs, high coherence | Strong, needs prompt tuning |
| Style & Tone | Warm, empathetic | Efficient, versatile |
| Multimodal Input | Vision (images, docs) | GPT‑4V offers images & voice |
| Customization | Limited custom instructions | Custom GPTs, rich tools |
| Global Availability | 159 countries; some limits | More accessible globally |
| Pricing | ~$15–20/month; token‑based pricing | $20/month Plus |
Pricing & Accessibility
- Claude Pro: ~$15–20/month; token‑based usage Reddit+14Moneycontrol+14digipix.ai+14TechRadar+9Reddit+9Reddit+9Claude ai+3arXiv+3Anthem Création+3DescriptReddit+4zapier.com+4Claude ai+4Semrush+6Reddit+6The Indian Express+6Reddit+2digipix.ai+2Semrush+2New York PostLifewire+4Anthem Création+4Semrush+4Reddit+2Semrush+2Tom’s Guide+2
- ChatGPT Plus: $20/month – GPT‑4, GPT‑4o Descript+2Semrush+2Anthem Création+2
- Claude is slightly cheaper per token, but daily limits can apply—some users report usage caps and slower speeds
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Massive context window – handling novels, research papers
- Integration with productivity tools (Canva, Figma, Notion etc.)
- More natural & empathetic tone
- Better step-wise reasoning and fewer hallucinations
- Stronger safe-guarding and ethical adherence
Cons
- Daily usage limits on some tiers
- Slower response speeds on complex queries
- No real-time web browsing (unlike ChatGPT with Bing)
- Limited personalization/custom instructions
Real-World Scenarios
- Research Students/Academics: Process long papers (200 pages+) in one go
- Developers: Generate bug‑free code with context
- Content Teams: Create visual posts from Notion and Canva via one interface
- Teams: Integrate Slack, Google Drive workflows inside chat
- Ethical Domains: In finance, healthcare—Claude’s risk-averse tone matters
FAQs (Adsense‑friendly)
Q1: Kya Claude 3 ChatGPT se zyada intelligent hai?
A1: Benchmarks, reasoning aur long‑text handling me Claude 3 Opus GPT‑4 ko halka sa lead deta hai—especially in multilingual math, coding, logic.
Q2: Kya Claude 3 images support karta hai?
A2: Haan, image/document vision input supported. Par image generation nahi. ChatGPT‑4V or DALL·E needed for creating images.
Q3: Pricing kya hai?
A3: Claude Pro around $15–20/month (token-based). ChatGPT Plus fixed $20/month with features.
Q4: Kya free version hai?
A4: Claude 2 free; Claude 3 trials limited. ChatGPT has GPT‑4o free occasionally.
Q5: Koṭ necessary hai?
A5: Developers prefer Claude for problem-solving; ChatGPT better for browsing, custom GPTs, image creation.
Conclusion: Kisko Chuney?
- Go for Claude 3, if you value deep reasoning, long-context comprehension, code quality, and strong ethical safety.
- Choose ChatGPT Plus, if you need web access, plugins, image generation, and **ease-of-use.
- Or use both—deploy Claude for heavyweight tasks, ChatGPT for browsing, visuals, and creative play.
2 thoughts on “Claude 3 by Anthropic – Really Smarter than ChatGPT? In-depth Review”